I now know all of your faces. If there is an afterlife, I'm gonna come back, and fucking kill all of you!

Sharjah
Dubai
Nairobi
Mombasa
Istanbul~
Some thoughts: We serve god as god serves us. The abrahamic god, specifically for Christianity and Islam, is for everyone and everything. That’s a trap. Nothing is for free. Worship him without effort. No criteria needs to be met except for your desire to be recruited. No criteria but your consent. The law of consent. You consented to this religion, to this god having the power and influence that he does. If something seems too good to be true, it is. We don’t just serve gods, they serve us too. When services are provided, they are for a specific purpose. Always. Every provider has a customer base, a clientele, an audience. Maybe the motivation for a service provided is social cohesion, for financial income, for attention. Maybe you want to look good for a magazine. Don’t let religious people tell you answers stop at “god was first and nothing came before.” EVERYTHING happens for a reason. There is a reason why the abrahamic god lets just ANYONE worship him, and it’s not because he’s so vastly bound in mercy and kindness and generosity that he must share it with his “creation”. Bullshit. Let’s examine the nature of this god. Shall we? Genocides countless populations for the sin of disbelief. Threatens non adherents of his religion with eternal torture. Makes a bet with the literal devil that his devotee won’t leave him after God creates immense suffering for him. A god worshipped by the people of Palestine. And yet the land is bombed and ravaged apart. The people’s cries and pleads to this god didn’t save them. Didn’t save them from the bombs raining down on their heads. Didn’t save them from the displacement and genocide. No. They weren’t saved. Their all knowing, all powerful god didn’t intervene. Some argue that it wasn’t abandonment. That god was testing them. I’ve noticed that people are very selective about the nature of that which exists and whether or not they can attribute it to god’s morality. A genocide can be god’s will, nothing to attribute about his intentions. He works in mysterious ways. The effect on the happiness or misery of his adherents says nothing about his motivations. But it isn’t the same when “God” helps you get an apartment, or when he helps you pass his chemistry test. THEN, it’s ‘god loves me.’ ‘God is looking out for me.’ Pick one. In my personal interpretation, if he is real, then he doesn’t care. If he has so confidently and repetitively expressed human emotion in these texts, “i am a jealous god” in the bible or “Indeed Allah loves the virtuous,” then he is capable of relating to human beings within emotions we can understand. I believe in the law of disclosure, and the law of consent. To sign a contract, there must be the terms and conditions, even if it’s a Faustian bargain, for the law of consent to take place. So he must admit to a core truth even if it isn’t the full truth. Love and hate live on relational opinion. And God has opinions in his relationship to us, even if we don’t know them. One of those might be apathy. Or an attitude of extraction and one sidedness. This is a god that lets any human being worship him, and it’s not because his mercy is boundless. Nothing in life is free. Nothing. All good gods are transactional. My favourite store sells me lemon tarts. I give them money. We go our separate ways. My favourite masseuse charges me for a deep tissue massage. I charge them, we head our separate ways. If some guy offered to babysit your kid “free of charge”, would you let them? Absolutely not. Kali has her people. Ancestral, clan, local gods, kamis, have their people. They have limits. All gods throughout history have made exchanges with humanity. Worship and venerate me, and i’ll give you prosperity. Place fruits at my altar and I shall grant you fertility. Spill virgin blood for me and i’ll grant you rainfall. There was always an exchange made. A god’s blessing never came for free. Their terms were explicit, and fair. And if they didn’t fulfil their end of the deal, they were abandoned by their people as a natural consequence, as the culture shifted to a god more useful. But this abrahamic god, what a fascinating entity, He doesn’t ‘NEED’ our worship, apparently. He, uniquely, posits himself as the creator of all that is. What would a creator need from the created naturally, except for it to exist? What does a painter need from the painted? Or a neocities page owner from it’s code? Nothing except for it to perform it’s function. But this god, he doesn’t ask for us to merely exist. No, no, no. He asks us to worship him. The creator asks the created to behave in a way contradictory to it’s design. An unnatural request for a creator. Even more unnatural, the threats that come along with it. My created, follow my command, or be tortured by my hand. Threat implies a desire for control. Who desires what they already have? Unless they don’t? One could also argue that hell is a natural consequence of disobedience. When you position yourself as the creator of everything that is, it is no longer a natural consequence, but your active choice, so again, a threat. So yes, desire for control is implied. So again, why would a god, who has a vested interest in obedience and is willing to use threats of torture to get it, allow his worshippers to follow no eligibility criteria except for their consent? Obviously, for power. It's the law of polarity. For every give, there is a take. For every day, there is a night. For life, there is death. Sure, one can give their neighbours cookies, but the expected return is a loving relationship. The evidence i provided of god's nature proves that isn't a natural conclusion. A god might want an exchange of a thriving loving relationship, but definitely not Allah/Yahweh.

Favourite movies and tv shows!

Interview with the vampire (2022)
The Fresh Prince of Bel Air
Roman Holiday
Victorious
The Amazing Digital Circus

Some thoughts: We serve god as god serves us. The abrahamic god, specifically for Christianity and Islam, is for everyone and everything. That’s a trap. Nothing is for free. Worship him without effort. No criteria needs to be met except for your desire to be recruited. No criteria but your consent. The law of consent. You consented to this religion, to this god having the power and influence that he does. If something seems too good to be true, it is. We don’t just serve gods, they serve us too. When services are provided, they are for a specific purpose. Always. Every provider has a customer base, a clientele, an audience. Maybe the motivation for a service provided is social cohesion, for financial income, for attention. Maybe you want to look good for a magazine. Don’t let religious people tell you answers stop at “god was first and nothing came before.” EVERYTHING happens for a reason. There is a reason why the abrahamic god lets just ANYONE worship him, and it’s not because he’s so vastly bound in mercy and kindness and generosity that he must share it with his “creation”. Bullshit. Let’s examine the nature of this god. Shall we? Genocides countless populations for the sin of disbelief. Threatens non adherents of his religion with eternal torture. Makes a bet with the literal devil that his devotee won’t leave him after God creates immense suffering for him. A god worshipped by the people of Palestine. And yet the land is bombed and ravaged apart. The people’s cries and pleads to this god didn’t save them. Didn’t save them from the bombs raining down on their heads. Didn’t save them from the displacement and genocide. No. They weren’t saved. Their all knowing, all powerful god didn’t intervene. Some argue that it wasn’t abandonment. That god was testing them. I’ve noticed that people are very selective about the nature of that which exists and whether or not they can attribute it to god’s morality. A genocide can be god’s will, nothing to attribute about his intentions. He works in mysterious ways. The effect on the happiness or misery of his adherents says nothing about his motivations. But it isn’t the same when “God” helps you get an apartment, or when he helps you pass his chemistry test. THEN, it’s ‘god loves me.’ ‘God is looking out for me.’ Pick one. In my personal interpretation, if he is real, then he doesn’t care. If he has so confidently and repetitively expressed human emotion in these texts, “i am a jealous god” in the bible or “Indeed Allah loves the virtuous,” then he is capable of relating to human beings within emotions we can understand. I believe in the law of disclosure, and the law of consent. To sign a contract, there must be the terms and conditions, even if it’s a Faustian bargain, for the law of consent to take place. So he must admit to a core truth even if it isn’t the full truth. Love and hate live on relational opinion. And God has opinions in his relationship to us, even if we don’t know them. One of those might be apathy. Or an attitude of extraction and one sidedness. This is a god that lets any human being worship him, and it’s not because his mercy is boundless. Nothing in life is free. Nothing. All good gods are transactional. My favourite store sells me lemon tarts. I give them money. We go our separate ways. My favourite masseuse charges me for a deep tissue massage. I charge them, we head our separate ways. If some guy offered to babysit your kid “free of charge”, would you let them? Absolutely not. Kali has her people. Ancestral, clan, local gods, kamis, have their people. They have limits. All gods throughout history have made exchanges with humanity. Worship and venerate me, and i’ll give you prosperity. Place fruits at my altar and I shall grant you fertility. Spill virgin blood for me and i’ll grant you rainfall. There was always an exchange made. A god’s blessing never came for free. Their terms were explicit, and fair. And if they didn’t fulfil their end of the deal, they were abandoned by their people as a natural consequence, as the culture shifted to a god more useful. But this abrahamic god, what a fascinating entity, He doesn’t ‘NEED’ our worship, apparently. He, uniquely, posits himself as the creator of all that is. What would a creator need from the created naturally, except for it to exist? What does a painter need from the painted? Or a neocities page owner from it’s code? Nothing except for it to perform it’s function. But this god, he doesn’t ask for us to merely exist. No, no, no. He asks us to worship him. The creator asks the created to behave in a way contradictory to it’s design. An unnatural request for a creator. Even more unnatural, the threats that come along with it. My created, follow my command, or be tortured by my hand. Threat implies a desire for control. Who desires what they already have? Unless they don’t? One could also argue that hell is a natural consequence of disobedience. When you position yourself as the creator of everything that is, it is no longer a natural consequence, but your active choice, so again, a threat. So yes, desire for control is implied. So again, why would a god, who has a vested interest in obedience and is willing to use threats of torture to get it, allow his worshippers to follow no eligibility criteria except for their consent? Obviously, for power. It's the law of polarity. For every give, there is a take. For every day, there is a night. For life, there is death. Sure, one can give their neighbours cookies, but the expected return is a loving relationship. The evidence i provided of god's nature proves that isn't a natural conclusion. A god might want an exchange of a thriving loving relationship, but definitely not Allah/Yahweh.